peakdecisions.org

  • Home
  • About

The ABC, Population Growth and A Big Australia: Official Complaint

April 19, 2018 by Peter 1 Comment

During the week commencing 12 March 2018 the Australian Broadcasting Corporation aired a number of programs on a Big Australia — the phrase used to encapsulate debates about the desirability of Australia’s rapid immigration-fuelled population growth. The specific programs included episodes of 4 Corners and QandA. Subsequently I submitted an official editorial complaint as per the ABC’s complaint-handling process. In the complaint I took care to refer in detail to the ABC’s own documented editorial standards. The ABC has acknowledged receipt of the complaint and will respond in writing in due course. As this response may take some time to provide, in the meantime I am publishing the text of my complaint here (PDF), for the interest of those who follow the population and immigration debate. I will also publish the text of the ABC’s response when received. The summary of the complaint is as follows (extracted from the conclusion of the document).

Based on the arguments and evidence presented in this complaint, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that the Programs do not meet Editorial Policy 4. Highly relevant principal perspectives were omitted or given very limited time. The Programs overwhelmingly favoured one perspective: that a Big Australia is inevitable and there is no room for debate about alternative scenarios. The Programs ignored opportunities to present alternative perspectives even when they were offered as low-hanging fruit (for example, the video questions on QandA). There was repeated reliance on the same narrow range of expert opinion, while other expert opinion was omitted, in defiance of the weight of evidence on these matters. Given that these same one-sided viewpoints and imbalances were repeated over several programs, it is very hard to argue that excesses in one particular program were re-balanced by the views expressed in other programs during the week that the Programs were aired or published. And it is hard to avoid the conclusion that in this instance, these outcomes expressed an implied editorial stance of the ABC towards the desirability of a Big Australia.

UPDATE  The ABC sent a response to this complaint on 16 May 2018. The full text of their response is here (PDF). This complaint is now under appeal (by me) to the Australian Communications and Media Authority.

 

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Immigration, Population

Comments

  1. RT says

    October 15, 2018 at 7:02 am

    I complained to the ABC about a somewhat similar issue about bias in a program, asking only that a diversity of opinion be presented and commentators are challenged if they provide opinion dressed up as fact or unsubstantiated statistics. All I received was an arrogant reply stating the program was not biased because the program catered to the viewers of that particular program who held a certain opinion! I was once a supporter of the ABC but no longer. I don’t want my money supporting poor quality journalism. Unfortunately I suspect that your complaint will come to nothing – that’s the state of the media these days.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

My Tweets

Recent Posts

  • “I simply am not a scientist.” Here is what Liberal MP Andrew Wallace says about climate change
  • FactCheck: Demographer Dr Liz Allen gets facts wrong on optimum level of immigration
  • The ABC, Population Growth and A Big Australia: Official Complaint
  • Dr Jonathon Sobels Nails It On Population and Immigration
  • Upcoming ABC shows on population and a Big Australia
  • Managing Australia’s Migrant Intake – Time for More Democracy
  • Why is Labor pushing a Big Australia?
  • Guy Rundle on population and immigration
  • Sustainable Development Commission to replace the Productivity Commission? It is past time to move beyond the Ptolemaic views of neoclassical economics
  • Heading towards a big Australia? Comments on the Productivity Commission Draft Report on Migrant Intake
  • Time to Stabilize Australia’s Population
  • Queensland election: May this be the stake through the heart of neoliberal dogma
  • John Faulkner calls for enhanced oversight of Australia’s intelligence agencies
  • Heidegger, Technology and Nazism: black notebooks add a black mark
  • Update on chemicals in bedding

More Posts

  • Climate Change (9)
  • Critical Theory (1)
  • Democracy (2)
  • Denial (4)
  • Financial crisis (1)
  • Immigration (5)
  • Neoclassical Economic Paradigm (1)
  • Neoliberalism (3)
  • Nuclear Power (1)
  • Population (9)
  • Science and Technology (1)
  • Toxic chemicals (2)

Energy and Climate Links

  • Blistered Orb
  • Brave New Climate
  • Climate Change Denial
  • Climate Progress
  • deSmogBlog
  • Fairewinds Energy Education
  • HowMany.org
  • James Hansen
  • Post Carbon Institute
  • Real Climate
  • Resilience
  • Skeptical Science
  • Union of Concerned Scientists

Nuclear Links

  • All Things Nuclear
  • Atomic Power Review
  • Brave New Climate
  • Greenpeace Nuclear Reaction Weblog
  • Nuclear Information and Resource Service
  • Nukefree.org
  • World Nuclear News

Population Links

  • HowMany.org
  • Population Matters
  • Population Reference Bureau
  • Sustainable Population Australia

Copyright © 2025 · peakdecisions.org · Web Design by: WarMarks

Copyright © 2025 · Peak Decisions Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

 

Loading Comments...